Sunday, 15 December 2024

HOW TO WIN THE BOOKER: EVERETT AND WOOD.


James: Shortlisted for the Booker Prize 2024

Although the  Booker shortlist is revered, and always anticipated, it has, in the past, been sometimes a bit of a let-down, often featuring books that are filled with 21st century angst, that are just too long or obscure or unnecessarily dense. Quite often they offer nothing but a bleakness that surely we can do without. This year, though, I've loved them all and can't wait to tell you what each book is about.  So far, in three posts, I've looked at the winner, which has  greener-than-green credentials...Orbital by Samantha Harvey, the deepest and most poetic, Held by Anne Michaels, and the raunchiest, The Safekeep byYael Van Der Wouden. In this post I'm going to look at two more before I finally turn my attention to the only 'quite long' novel on the list. 

James, by the long-acclaimed American author Percival Everett, who is back on the Booker shortlist after being there two years ago with The Trees, has written what I think is the funniest and most powerful novel on this list. 

Stone Yard Devotional, by Australian writer Charlotte Wood, is also a book that made me smile. Maybe Wood didn't want her book to be thought of as  'comic' but  it features, quite heavily, an infestation of mice in an isolated community of nuns, which decidedly raises more than one chuckle.

Percival Everett
Percival Everett
Before I began James, I did wonder if the world needed yet another retelling of Huckleberry Finn. But James is a hilariously dark, beautifully compassionate yet deeply corrective, perfect for the 21st Century reader. The titular James, as he'd rather be called, is nothing like the 'Yessum' Jim of the original. In fact, he, and his fellow Mississipi slaves only use such language when the white masters are around. In their heads, in the narrative of this book, and when they talk together, their English is perfectly received. This device allows Everett to present James as  a fully-rounded character, enabling his voice to be heard properly  and giving him the agency to direct his own life, even under threat of the whip.
 
Here's James teaching his children how to speak to slave owners. 

    "Let's try some situational translations. You're walking down the street and you see Mrs Holiday's kitchen is on fire. She's standing in her yard, her back to the house, unaware. How do you tell her?"   

     "Fire, Fire," January said.

    "Direct. And that's almost correct," I say.

    "The youngest of them, lean and tall five-year-old Rachel, said, "Lawdy, missum. Looky dere."

    "Perfect," I said. "Why is that correct?"

    Lizzie raised her hand, "Because we must let the whites be the ones who name the trouble." 

The reviewer Anna Bonet also loved this book; Powerful” is an overused adjective when it comes to describing books, but it feels right here. In fact, James is more than that. At times, it is brutal to read – necessarily so, given that slavery is one of its primary subject matters – but it also manages to be light and funny and completely gripping. I could barely put it down.

When he realises he is going to be sold away from his beloved wife and children, he runs, falling in with Huck in much the same way as in the original Mark Twain, but in this story, he's the one who cares for the lad, leads their escape and engineers the happy ending. 


Charlotte Wood.
Charlotte Wood

Stone Yard Devotional has an unnamed narrator, who constantly surprises us. At the start of the novel she has abandoned her job and husband and, although not religious, decides to spend a short time in a rural Australian nunnery. The convent's routine of bells and service turns out to be just what she needs and she stays; a decision she never fully explains. As she moves through each day as a secular member of a convent, she reveals that she has uncomfortable memories of a girl in her class at school. This woman is now a famous nun, and is about to visit, bringing with her a corps the nuns wish to bury in their grounds. 

The story quickly becomes surreal, almost oppressive, as we watch, fascinated, a dance of manners between  the narrator, the charismatic Helen and the society of nuns. it takes a long time to get permission to give the corps a Christian burial, but meanwhile we witness the infestations of millions of mice being unceremoniously dumped into a deep hole in the ground. 

Orlando Bird, in the Telegraph, says this of the book;  Our narrator’s world is one of “dormant” truths waiting to be “released into the open at last”. Yet Stone Yard Devotional is all the more accomplished for resisting neat conclusions – “I don’t know why” is a familiar refrain – and recognising that even the examined life sits only “on the edge of comprehension”. Wood may not be the first artist to embrace uncertainties, mysteries and doubts, but at its best her novel does it beautifully.

It's a good read, but of the two, I will never forget James' journey up and down the Mississippi. 



Saturday, 30 November 2024

Writing about the Climate Crisis–– A Workshop for Writers

photo: Nina Milton

Habitat loss, marine pollution and climate change issues are blighting the natural world. They are also changing the lives of communities across the globe. There are many writers who wish to write this complex subject, but are often at a loss about where to begin and in which direction to head. 

This WRITERS' WORKSHOP is being held on Friday 24th JANUARY 2025 

online, and available to all writers, whatever your situation. 


Co-ordinated by Nina Milton, this 2 hour workshop is suitable for prose writers interesting in pursuing these subjects.  It won’t pretend to find the all answers, but it will allow us to become a little more aware of the issues around the subject and challenge our responses as writers. 


You may be thinking of writing about the changes or threats to the diversity of the natural world, about the communities effected by changing environments, or about the routes to more sustainable living. You may even be imagining a different future world.


We will discuss  some of the ways this sort of writing has been tackled by both fiction and nonfiction writers, at new and different ways of approaching these issues, and look how this writing will present in the future. 


With discussion and writing exercises with feedback on writing achieved and the chance to peer review each other's work, it is hoped that by the end of the workshop, attendees will feel more confident about approaching this vast subject, and have some new skills to enable this. 


Once you have signed up, you can access the information. on this workshop with links and reading recommendations.


Contact Nina Milton at kitchentablewriters@live.com to find out more details of the workshop.


Costs; £10 PER WRITER: Bursaries are available to help with costs. 




How to Win the Booker Prize: HELD by Anne Michaels

Held 

Anne Michaels: ‘the writing is always personal, hypersensitive and profoundly interior’
Anne Michaels

Michaels must be one of the few writers today who can pull off writing in fragments, for fugitive pieces could as easily serve as the title of this new book, Held, a novel similarly made up of scraps of storytelling and essayistic fragments, and the themes of memory, war, and personal ghosts, revisit her preoccupations. But this book not about the Holocaust, but of many wars and war zones, and the relationship of the characters to these. 

I first read the Canadian novelist and poet Anne Michaels when her  1996 first novel, the multi-award-winning Fugitive Pieces, after it won the Orange Prize for Fiction.The story is divided into two sections––Jakob Beer is a Polish Holocaust survivor––while Ben is the son of two Holocaust survivors. 

The themes relate to the Holocaust––trauma, grief, loss and memory which are explored thought nature metaphors. The story has a poetic style, which has caused some critics to feel that it re-imagines the 'story' of the Holocaust, partly through nature.

The Booker Prize judges said some very nice things about this book;

There are very few books that can achieve a pitch of poetic intensity sustained across a whole novel. Through broken stanza-like paragraphs and chapters that move between different members of the family across a century, Held achieves the feat of being deeply moving and asks the question ‘Who can say what happens when we are remembered?’ with tenderness.'

‘We loved the quietness of this book: we surrendered to it. The large themes are of the instability of the past and memory, but it works on a cellular level due to the astonishing beauty of the details. Whether it is the mistakes that are knitted into a sweater so that a drowned sailor can be identified, or the rituals of making homecoming pancakes, or what it feels like to be scrutinised as you are painted, the novel makes us pause.’



We are carried back and forth in time. Each section introduces new characters, different settings.here are quite a lot of characters within the book and one thing I tried to do was tie them all together; it seems that most of them are related to the others, but often it's quite hard to find that relationships through the generations as we move from the First World War to out own times, and the wars most recently remembered. Anyway, here goes; perhaps this will help you pin down the elusive butterfly that is this absorbing read:


John is a soldier who returns to his wife after being injured during the First World War. As he attempts to come to terms with the psychological trauma of his experiences, he finds works as a photographer.

Helena is John’s wife, a talented artist who constantly doubts her own talent and supports John as he struggles with the vivid memories of his experiences during the war.

Anna is John and Helena’s daughter; her work as a doctor means she frequently leaves her family to work in war zones.

Maria inherited the same caring nature as her mother, Anna, and also becomes a doctor, and is similarly drawn to working in war-torn areas. 

Working through the characters and the dates, I began to pick up echoes and piece together the tenuous personal links which hold together the disparate stories, first understanding that Aimo, who meets another Anna in Finland in 2025 must be the child whose musician parents we saw being expelled from Estonia for thought crimes in 1980, and then deciding that when we meet a Frenchwoman, out collecting firewood in1902, falls briefly for a photographer, their baby will become John. But there are also links which work though the themes, and it felt to me that these are meant to be even stronger becoming the point of the story, so that the characters are the carriers of theme and idea, posing profound questions about the human state, all expressed in Michael's arresting prose.

This makes her writing sometimes very difficult, but also so absorbing to read. What I loved most (even better than trying to piece it all together) are the little snapshots which are often hugely affecting, suffused with an awful, aching yearning for what is lost. It demands  thought and concentration from its readers but more than repays them. Here, Mara, back from being a medic at the front of a war, remembers some experiences:

She told them about her friend, a nurse who had more experience and compassion in her hands than Mara felt she would ever have…this same nurse had ridden through a bicycle through the dark, no light to give her away, packets of medicine taped to her skin under her waistband, who plummeted into an abyss that had not been there only hours before. The father who kept a scrap of cloth tied with string around her neck, fill with teeth, proof his sone had existed, though Mara knew he would never be sure they were his son's. 

However, I must admit there are critics of this kind of writing; this style of novel. Bikerbuddy,  online, said; 'I’ve never read Anne Michaels before. Polarising books can be interesting and I was interested in why this book had such a range of reactions with the public. Some loved the language and sentiments of the novel, others thought it pretentious, opaque, overwritten and/or confused. For my own part, I enjoyed aspects of the broad story,I felt as I read, it is a novel about an idea, as many are. But unlike many great novels which allow the reader space to ponder and reflect, Held felt like an act of proselytising. It’s a thesis dressed up in people’s clothing, walking and talking, with a determined purpose. This is an aspect of the book I disliked, yet I have found that others have been drawn to it. Held was different for me. It felt like a manipulative book. It felt dishonest.

The Times Literary Supplement said; The lush, lyrical prose favoured by the likes of Anne Michaels…is a risky business. At best it brings intensity, inwardness, descriptive beauty and a relief from the thudding and-then-and-then of conventional storytelling; at worst it can result in vatic waffle. In either case the impulse is to suppress definite characterization, historic specificity and narrative momentum in favour of “poetic” evocation.

Anna Bonnet says; This Canadian novelist, who won the Women’s Prize in 1997 for her Holocaust novel, Fugitive Pieces, is also a poet and it shows: Held is told in tiny, poetic vignettes. For me, this was part of the problem. While there are some mesmerising lines in this book, it is all so fragmented that I struggled to follow the narrative thread, let alone care for the characters. 


But I'm going to stand up for these diffulties. If you don't like a novelist's style and voice, find another novel to read, because there are plenty out there. The Booker Prize shortlist is testament to this; six extremely unique and original novels, all with something to say, I believe. 

I'm looking at all the Booker Shortlisted Books 2024, to see how they can help the writer. Here I review Safekeep and Here I review the winner; Orbital 

Sunday, 24 November 2024

How to Win the Booker: THE SAFEKEEP by Yael van Der Wouden

 


The Safekeep by Yael Van Der Wouden

In her website Yael Van Der Wouden introduces herself as A great smalltalker... available as a +1 for your cousin's wedding. Woulden also keeps a blog, Dear David: An Advice Column, in which Sir David Attenborough speaks about the natural world in answer to writers' problems. It's funny and clever in a similar way that The Safekeep is funny and clever. And yet her 2018 essay, On (Not) Reading Anne Frank  suggests that The Safekeep is also a darkened polemic on the Dutch position after the 2nd WW.


In her Booker interview, she explains the moment that this book came into her mind, starting with… a fascination with how the Dutch narrativise national histories; my obsession with homes and the fantasy of owning a home; wanting to explore desire as the flipside of repulsion. The way it happened was like this: I was in the car on the way back from a funeral, looking out over flat Dutch fields, and somewhere between grief and a need to escape the idea bloomed, of a house, a woman and a stranger.


A house, a youngish woman, her two siblings and a stranger. 


It is Holland in the 60's and Isabel lives alone in the family home, weighed down with duty left by her dead parents, avoiding contact with humans, hating most of the people she knows: Louis, who will be gifted the house once he marries (and he’s in no hurry to stop moving through pretty girls like his latest, Eva):  and Hendrick, who lives with Sebastian, a person Isabel particularly turns her face from in shame




Author Yael Van Der Wouden.


This book did not win the Booker Prize. So maybe you won’t want your book to be––suddenly and surprisingly-–this sexy, with intense emotion and fiery physicality… Isabel could see herself from the dresser mirror: face red, mouth like a violence


Wouden admits––erotica is about the knife’s edge of voyeurism and participation. As a reader, you want to feel like you are present, but if you are too present then I think the text tries to envelope you, tries to comfort, and I think good erotic writing makes you a little uncomfortable.


You might not want your novel to be in the 1st person perspective of a repressed, unlikeable woman such as Isabel, without being able to show that vulnerability that hides behind such a front. And, in 1st person, how can the story reveal what happened almost 20 years previously? Two-thirds of the way through, after the central explosion of love and lust, we reach The Diary. Diaries don’t often work in modern novels, but this one, stolen by Isabel after a caustic row with her lover, reveals the darkest sides of wartime Europe.


Think about taking an extended symbol throughout the book, as Wouden does. In the opening lines, Isobel finds  broken pottery in the garden. It's a shard from the china plates her mother loved, and which she now keeps locked away. She knows one has never broken, but if that is so, how could this shard be in the garden? The answer dogs her throughout the novel, and it is not until we read the diary that we know the shocking answer. 


You might like to be in Wouden's position,however, of having her debut novel snapped up by Penguin after a bidding war. 


What did the English reviewers say about this debut? The Observer says that the author weaves this story of historical reckoning (or its avoidance) with an account of Isabel's individual and sexual awakening,

The Guardian's reviewer said The book's powerful final act provides an already weighty emotional situation with an extra layer of historical heft.


Reviewer Anne Bonnet loved it; The Safekeep is simmering and sexy, but it is also a Trojan horse of a novel. Not much is, rightly, given away in the synopsis and it is only in the last third that you realise you have been reading a very different book…


Perhaps for me, the ending wasn’t quite perfect. But that might be because whatever way the final moments of such a twisted the story might go, I’ll have wanted it to go in the other direction. Happier? Darker? I’ll let you read it and make up your own minds.

Thursday, 21 November 2024

How to Win the Booker Prize: ORBITAL by Samantha Harvey

2024 Booker Prize winner Samantha Harvey holding a copy of her book "Orbital" and the trophy
photograph: epa

Orbital unfolds over a single day in the life of six astronauts and cosmonauts aboard the International Space Station. Samantha Harvey allows us to marvel at Earth’s splendour through the thoughts, memories and work of the people on board. She allows them to pose the question: What is life without Earth? What is Earth without humanity?

Orbital is Samantha Harvey’s fifth novel. On the 12th of November 2014, she stood amongst applause to receive the Booker trophy. Her acceptance speech began with a joke; ‘I was told we weren’t allowed to swear in our speech, so there goes mine’. She dedicated her prize to everybody who ‘speaks for and not against the Earth…and the dignity of other humans, other life; and all the people who speak for and call for peace.



If you would like your novel to win the Booker, you could start by picking apart what makes a winner. Why did the judges almost unanimously decide on Orbital?

Firstly, it's original. it is the first Booker Prize-winning book set in space. It has a natty little chart that describes the voyage of the SSI over one Earth day at the front of the book. It has chapters that align with the rising of the sun every 90 minutes. 

But there are some specifics that are probably key components each time. The judges recognised this book's beauty and ambition, saying: 'It reflects Harvey’s extraordinary intensity of attention to the precious and precarious world we share'.  They were 'determined to find a book that moved us, a book that had capaciousness and resonance, that we are compelled to share'. 

Surprisingly, it is very short. This is a novella. It is so much shorter than some winners, that you could fit four Orbitals into some of them.  The Luminaries by Eleanor Catton won in 2013, at 832 pages, compared to the 239 pages of Orbital. But judge Kit  De Waal said that Orbital is 'the right length of book for what it’s trying to achieve'.

I loved this book. Its descriptions of the Earth from the ISS are stunning, lyrical and memorable, and yet sparse; we can never quite get enough of them, which is the best way to write descriptions, after all. There are only six characters, plus the people they carry in their heads. We don't get to know them very well, but rather as they all get to know each other, in that intimate, yes sporadic way we get to know our work colleagues for instance, sometimes sharing something truly important about their lives and lots of minor, day-to-day things, while probably not knowing much, say, about their family or the layout of their homes. But what we do see is what they also witness; the marvellous beauty of the Earth as they witness a sunrise every 90 minutes and follow the progression and devastation of a super tornado of life-threatening proportions as it assaults and wrecks south-east Asia. They are passing on the information, but feel powerless to help.

The odd 'other' perspective is also allowed in, so that we can travel back to the 'Big Bang' or meet the laboratory mice who are learning to fly. And then there is  Diego Velázquez’s Las Meninas, which is with the crew as a postcard. They talk deeply about the unique illusion of reality created in this painting. Welcome,” Shaun’s wife has written on the postcard, “to the labyrinth of mirrors that is human life.”

Having finished the book and laid it down with a satisfied sigh, I turned to the reviewers to see what they had thought. Most had read this book before it had been shortlisted, and most, like me, found it such an absorbing, educative read. 

Anne Bonner, in INEWS says...With the modern world being as it is, it is not a surprise that a story set in space is a strong Booker contender.  At times it feels a bit like you’re reading an essay meditating on human existence as opposed to a novel. You also have the sense of observing these characters as though they’re floating in a snow globe: as beautiful as it is, something is stopping you from connecting with them.

The Economist did find flaws, and I can to a degree sympathise with the line they took: A slim, slightly worthy novel in which everything and nothing happens Yes, it is a tiny bit worthy, and nothing does much happen in it. So one thing you might try,  if you follow Harvey's model of winning the Booker, is create an epic poem in prose form.  

But who knows? With another night's sleep, the judges might have made a different decision. There are always 6 shortlisted novels for the Booker Prize, and I will review each of the 2024 books in turn and continue to think about...HOW TO WIND THE BOOKER PRIZE. 

You can read more about Las Mininas here.

Monday, 28 October 2024

Writing the Global Crisis




The global crisis – climate heating, habitat loss and marine pollution among other human-sourced issues are blighting the natural world. They are also changing the lives of communities across the globe. Many students wish to write about this complex subject, but are often at a loss about where to begin and in which direction to head. 


I’m not going to pretend I know any more about the climate crisis than the reader, and I’m not going to look for the answers, Butt writing the climate crisis will allow us to become a little more aware of the issues around the subject and challenge our responses as writers. 


Are you considering writing about the changes in the climate, or threats to the diversity of the natural world? About the communities effected by changing environments, or about the routes to more sustainable living? You may already be writing about these things. You may even be imagining a different future world.


In this blogpost I want to discuss  some of the ways this sort of writing has been tackled by both fiction and nonfiction writers, and look at new and different ways of approaching these issues. I'll also take a punt on how this writing will present in the future. So, once you’ve read this post, do get back to me via the Comment Page, so that the discussion can continue. I’m including a few writing exercises which might help you feel more confident about approaching this vast subject, and have some new skills to enable this. 


When thinking about writing the environmental crisis try to separate out the approaches people are already making. Think about the re-evaluation of science, informed policymaking, and governmental choices, as well as the way protest groups and the small actions of ordinary citizens are forming the debate. What happens when these separate things are put into the melting pot? Different people may reach different conclusions, depending on what they value.


WHICH DEBATE ARE YOU WRITING?


There is no single issue here, but many issues all leading out of our overuse of natural resources. 


Global Warming is mostly caused by fossil fuels resulting in global greenhouse gas emissions which blanket the Earth, trapping the sun’s heat, and warming Earth faster than at any point in recorded history. Hotter temperatures over time are changing weather patterns and disrupting the usual balance of nature.


Environmental damage, of course this starts with the warming of the atmosphere, but also includes air pollution, poor soil management, insect loss leading to poor pollination, deforestation, growth of human population, food waste, global trade and urbanisation.


Biodiversity Loss

The past 50 years have seen a rapid growth of human consumption, population, resulting in humanity using more of the Earth’s resources than it can replenish naturally. 


More than 500 species of land animals are on the brink of extinction and are likely to be lost within 20 years; the same number were lost over the whole of the last century. The scientists say that without the human destruction of nature, this rate of loss would have taken thousands of years. 


Plastic Pollution and the marine crisis 

National Geographic found that 91% of all plastic that has ever been made is not recycled and plastic takes 400 years to decompose. 

The quantity of marine debris is increasing in oceans world-wide. Plastic pieces outnumber plankton on the ocean surface 6:1.In the ocean, plastic debris injures and kills fish, seabirds and marine mammals. In 2010, a California grey whale washed up dead on the shores of the Puget Sound. Autopsies indicated that its stomach contained a pair of pants and a golf ball, more than 20 plastic bags, small towels, duct tape and surgical gloves.


The Human Armageddons

These might include destruction of humanity through the dangers of AI, deadly new virus pandemics or even nuclear war,  


Exercise  

Focus tightly any one of the above aspects and write for ten minutes; 

  • A nonfiction summing-up of your feelings
  • A poem about your feelings
  • A snippet of new story with new characters
  • A continuation of something you’ve been writing.


Past, Present and Future

Climate change is not so much an “issue”––it is an emerging reality. This new reality unfolding has a past, present and a future. A past that has been largely obscured but which is now breaking out into mainstream consciousness. Writers are getting involved at all those points, writing and re-writing stories that we thought we knew, that we should know now, and that we might only speculate on.



There are separate debates within science, within policy and within economics. There are debates about how scientific findings should guide governmental and political policy. There are personal decisions being made all the time, some based on strong evidence that alterations to lifetstyle will help, some based on heresy or even conspiracy theories. Here are at least the major aspects of the global crisis.


Exercise 

How do you see the future of mankind or the Earth herself? Choose one aspect or idea for all the different possibilities of how life will be in say 50 or 100 years; have an educated guess, or, even better, create your idea of a future possibility. Such guesses can be as fun or as ridiculous as you wish. 


Here’s my suggestion; 2100: Humanity has been almost wiped out and people live in very small communities, which have lost the ability to communicate with each other.


Here’s the opening of a poem by Pascale Petit from her book Tiger Girl (Bloodaxe)


The day will come when the papers will only tell leaf-stories

Of blackbird’s  quarrels with sparrows


Their pages will roll back into  trees, 

and the front page will be bark…


Take one of these ideas; not necessarily your own, but the one that has triggered a small idea that you could write about for ten minutes. 


FINDING THE RIGHT GENRE OR FORM

There are specific genres springing up that deal solely with these issues. 

You might think about these alternatives when choosing how to structure your writing 

Ecofiction’ or ‘Cli-Fi’  allows novelists and short story writers to combine the art of storytelling with their ideas about the environmental challenges, and their predictions for the future. 


Stories scripted for TV, film, radio or even theatre, allow immediate reactions from the audience, and a wide ‘pick-up’. 


Some ideas for story, especially dramatised documentary stories may be a perfect fit for scripting. The global crisis is alive on TV and UK radio and that may help you get a positive answer to your pitch.


Nonfiction may be a more direct way of alerting people to issues than, fiction. Articles, papers and books are being writing all the time, so be sure to be original and keep within your own ‘voice’ and state your own passions.


Poetry is a wonderful way to express the ideas and emotions this subject raises. It touches people’s hearts…the only drawback may be that the people who read poetry are already ‘won over’ on this debate.


Eco nonfiction is not now in its infancy, but is flowering and there are opportunities to write nonfiction and narrative journalism,  bringing the facts creatively to a broad readership. Also known as ecological or environmental literature, this a genre that encompasses a diverse array of works spanning novels, short stories, and poetry which breathes life into the environmental movement through the power of storytelling.


At its core, eco-fiction seeks to illuminate the intricate web of relationships between humans and the natural world, exploring themes such as conservation, climate change, and biodiversity loss. Unlike traditional environmental literature, which often adopts a didactic tone, eco-fiction employs the art of storytelling to evoke empathy, fostering a deeper connection between readers and the environment. Novels like Flight Behavior by Barbara Kingsolver (Harper Perennial, 2013), in which blends science and a story about a bizarre act of nature, and The Overstory, winner of the Pulitzer Prize in Fiction, Richard Powers’s twelfth novel interlocks fables with a is a world alongside ours—vast, slow, interconnected, resourceful, magnificently inventive, and almost invisible to us.





Eco-fiction has a tendency to negate writing strategies such as conflict, tension and empathy, but  Kingsolver and Powers successfully demonstrates the implications of a changing planet while maintaining these important parts of writing fiction. 


We Are All Completely Beside Ourselves, by Karen Joy Fowler (Serpent's Tail 2014), deals with our attitude to animal welfare. The narrator, Rosemary describes her loneliness after the loss of her sister, Fern. A clever use of the ‘central reveal’ allows the writer to portray the plight of animals, both past and present, and describe the bonds that unite all sentient beings.


In fact novels with an ecological attitude are not new. Ursula Le Guin’s wonderful novel The Word for Tree is Forest  was written decades ago, and shows a wrecked Earth and the mining of other planet. The Drowned World was written by JG Ballard in 1962, but the concept of an overheated, rainy world is still amazingly pertinent.


Any perspective and approach are possible, if it’s undertaken in a well-informed, and well-crafted way. It could be a piece of New Nature Writing, a short story or chapter which dramatises an aspect of the Climate Emergency, a poem that articulates a more-than-human perspective, a script which brings to life the struggles of an eco-activist with a climate denier partner or parent.  

It has to be emphasised that one critical position isn’t the only one to be taken – a cross-section is a far better approach.  

The important thing to remember is that the ecological imaginary is broad and demands a multiplicity of perspectives. All voices are welcome – we all have an authentic, authoritative voice and a stake in the survival of our planet and species.    


Exercise

As our world grapples with pressing ecological challenges, authors are turning to the natural world as a muse, crafting narratives that delve deep into the interconnectedness between humanity and the environment.


  • Freewrite a short piece, to explore your own feelings on any the issues explored above
  • Read this piece, preferably aloud. Think about its possibilities. Make notes
  • Amalgamate your thinking into the freewrite Perhaps concentrate on one aspect. This can be the start of fiction, poetry or nonfiction.
  • Using all of this work start a piece of creative writing. 



THRUTOPIAS

Manda Scott has initiated a huge push for this sort of fiction. She says, in https://mandascott.co.uk/why-we-need-thrutopias/...

We know that inspiring stories shape our futures. Throughout human history, our power to imagine a better world has pushed – or pulled – us away from the comfort of the known.

But our stories of power, accumulation and self-aggrandisement have brought us to the edge of extinction and we urgently need new heroes, new ways of doing things, new peaks to aim for. If you knew you were at the last days of the human story, what would you write? How would you write?”

Thrutopian writing wants to move through the dystopian end that most novels about the future of humanity (both for adults and young adults) have. At the moment dystopian fiction tends to end with only a good outcome for the protagonist…the rest of that society is still living in misery. Thrutopias push through the idea that disaster is non-reversible, to look at how a better ending can be achieved.

It also delves into the embodied, local, and transhuman aspects, challenging conventional notions of 'nature' and the perceived separation between humanity and the natural world.  

By addressing the ever-present spectre of didacticism in speculative and dystopian fiction, the writer is encouraged to consider a spectrum of perspectives, and to make their own ‘ecologies’ of connection. The emphasis, then changes to be on how writers wish to explore the various global crises.  

Try reading these novels with a Thrutopian outcome The Future (9780008309176)

The Future by Naomi Alderson

Cloud Cuckoo Land, by Anthony Doerr 

 Any Human Power. by Manda Scott

Transrealism and the Transhuman

These words refer to writing that looks beyond human beings to robots and cyborgs.

With the 2016 TV serialisation into ten episodes of an adaptation of  Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid’s Tale (McCelland and Stewart 1985), not to mention her cyborg trilogy: Oryx and Crake also The Year of the Flood and Maddaddam, new forms of experience  are being explored. These are  literary modes that  attempt to mix the techniques of fantasy, science fiction, futuristic and dystopian literature with the technique of naturalistic realism, resulting in books like The Road by Cormac McCarthy (2006) and Matt Haig’s  2013 book for young adults, The Humans (Canongate Books), which has as its narrator an alien in the body of a Cambridge professor, constantly puzzled by our primitive ways until he begins to develop an emotional attachment to the lives of humans, in particular, our ‘gift for love’.

THE ANTHROPOCENE

The Anthropic PrincipleHumans have become the single most influential species on the planet, causing significant global warming and other changes to land, environment, water, organisms and the atmosphere. The word Anthropocene comes from the Greek terms for human ('anthropo') and new ('cene'), but its definition is controversial. It was coined in the 1980s, then popularised in 2000 by atmospheric chemist Paul J Crutzen and diatom researcher Eugene F Stoermer. The duo suggested that we are living in a new geological epoch.

Katie Pavid makes the case for the idea that we are living in a time many people refer to as the Anthropocene. She points out that: 

“It is widely accepted that our species, Homo sapiens, has had such a significant impact on Earth and its inhabitants that we will have a lasting - and potentially irreversible - influence on its systems, environment, processes and biodiversity.

The Earth is 4.5 billion years old, and modern humans have been around for around a mere 200,000 years. Yet in that time we have fundamentally altered the physical, chemical and biological systems of the planet on which we and all other organisms depend.

In the past 60 years in particular, these human impacts have unfolded at an unprecedented rate and scale. This period is sometimes known as the Great Acceleration. Carbon dioxide emissions, global warming, ocean acidification, habitat destruction, extinction and widescale natural resource extraction are all signs that we have significantly modified our planet.

Not everyone agrees that these changes represent enough evidence to declare a new formal geological epoch, the Anthropocene. Scientists all over the world are still debating.


LANGUAGE

Changing the way we word certain phrases makes a difference. Not long ago, we were talking about the ‘global warming theory’ and now we’re talking about the ‘global heating crisis’. Rather than 'climate skeptics', we talk about ‘climate deniers’. .

.Rather than ‘climate change,’ we talk about 'climate emergency'.


 One way to structure you language when starting to write is to work with

Opposites'. Consider; 


Hard science 

versus 

emotional reaction


Evidence of a global crisis

 Versus 

Conspiracy theories, corporate lying and disbelieve


Good Policy making

Versus 

Ignorant Policies or even blatant disregarding policy decisions


The macro and microcosms  The big players, governments, social media

 versus

 the little person and small communities. 


Groups or families in denial

Versus

People coming together to make a difference 


Using Metaphor

 Let's take a further look at Pascale Petit’s beautiful poem. It’s full of marvellous metaphors, which as a way of describing that can really help your language hit home when writing about emotively charged subjects like this one. Here are a few of her amazing metaphors



  • The buttress root of my armchair
  • Phones that light up with chorophyll
  • An apiary of apps
  • Retweet birdsong


Your writing has to be a pleasurable read. Of course, that means different things to different readers, but no one likes to be lectured or spoken down to. No one wants to be told how to think. Writing like a tub-thumper is likely to result in your work not being read. 


Statements made on paper always shut down debate. So use questions instead. Questions lead to stories...statements shut story down. Therefor if you feel ambivalent about any issue you want to write about don't hesitate to exploit your own hesitancies by asking difficult questions. Fiction especially should always be about 'asking the question' rather than finding the answer.


Be aware that you cannot use your own political aims or beliefs to stage a story or article; your own opinions cannot take centre stage. When writing  fiction, you will find that your created characters take over––they should be allowed to have their own opinions––it's the questions that arise from these that will make your story engrossing. 


The important thing to remember is that the this story of greenness and kindliness to the planet and its inhabitants is wide and broad and demands a multiplicity of perspectives. That means your voice, among so many others will be welcome – we all have an authentic voice when talking and writing about our planet and species.    



Exercise  

Take one image that is important to you that can represent what you feel about the way the planet is changing 


Try to express it in a metaphorical way.


OR


Create a tub-thumping character who feels very strongly about something. 

Start a monologue in their voice, let them state their opinions. Then start to move the debate, allowing subtle  caveats to creep into their minds; finish with the character acknowledging the opposite opinion. 


OR


Think about how you could use opposites in various ways in work you are approaching.



Earth From Space, Artwork Photograph by Detlev Van Ravenswaay

WHAT NOW?


All of these things are at your fingertips when writing the global crisis. But you cannot spread that writing too thinly. Think about all the aspects, components and issues I’ve raised and talked about in this one little post, and focus your thoughts narrowly to get the best impact into your writing. 


Good Luck!